ACS Synthetic Biology

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) enables highly sensitive, high-resolution detection of gene transcripts. Moreover, by employing multiple probes, this technique allows for multiplexed, simultaneous detection of distinct gene expression patterns spatiotemporally, making it a valuable spatial transcriptomics approach. Owing to these advantages, FISH techniques are rapidly being adopted across diverse areas of basic biology. However, conventional protocols often rely on volatile, toxic reagents such as formalin or methanol, posing potential health risks to researchers. Here, we present a safer protocol that replaces these chemicals with low-toxicity alternatives, without compromising the high detection sensitivity of FISH. We validated this protocol using both in situ hybridization chain reaction (HCR) and signal amplification by exchange reaction (SABER)-FISH in frozen sections of various model organisms, including mouse (Mus musculus), amphibians (Xenopus laevis and Pleurodeles waltl), and medaka (Oryzias latipes). Our results demonstrate successful multiplexed detection of morphogenetic and cell-type marker genes in these model animals using this safer protocol. The protocol has the additional advantage of requiring no proteolytic enzyme treatment, thus preserving tissue integrity. Furthermore, we show that this protocol is fully compatible with EGFP immunostaining, allowing for the simultaneous detection of mRNAs and reporter proteins in transgenic animals. This protocol retains the benefits of highly sensitive, multiplexed, and multimodal detection afforded by integrating in situ HCR and SABER-FISH with immunohistochemistry, while providing a safer option for researchers, thereby offering a valuable tool for basic biology.

Obtaining novel antibodies against specific protein targets is a widely important yet experimentally laborious process. Meanwhile, computational methods for antibody design have been limited by low success rates that currently require resource-intensive screening. Here, we introduce Germinal, a broadly enabling generative pipeline that designs antibodies against specific epitopes with nanomolar binding affinities while requiring only low-n experimental testing. Our method co-optimizes antibody structure and sequence by integrating a structure predictor with an antibody-specific protein language model to perform de novo design of functional complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) onto a user-specified structural framework. When tested against four diverse protein targets, Germinal successfully designed functional antibodies across all targets and binder formats, testing only 43-101 designs for each antigen. Validated designs also exhibited robust expression in mammalian cells and high sequence and structural novelty. We provide open-source code and full computational and experimental protocols to facilitate wide adoption. Germinal represents a milestone in efficient, epitope-targeted de novo antibody design, with notable implications for the development of molecular tools and therapeutics.

Targeted protein degradation (TPD) is a therapeutic strategy to remove disease-causing proteins by routing them to the ubiquitin-proteasome, autophagy, or lysosme machineries. For instance, proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are synthetic hetero-bifunctional small molecules that simultaneously bind the target and an E3 ubiquitin ligase to drive ubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Despite considerable success, designing such molecules is challenging and the number of currently addressable ubiquitin E3 ligases is limited. Here we demonstrate hetero-bifunctional de novo designed proteins as alternatives for TPD to access more targets and ligases. First, we develop a stable and highly adaptable helix-turn-helix scaffold for presenting different binding sites. Next, we use computational protein design to incorporate and embellish hot-spot- binding sites to target BCL-xL, plus short linear motifs (SLiMs) for KLHL20 ligase recruitment. The resulting mono- and bi-functionalised proteins bind the targets in vitro, and the latter degrade BCL-xL in cells leading to apoptosis.

Understanding how cells migrate through confined environments is crucial for elucidating fundamental biological processes, including cancer invasion, immune surveillance, and tissue morphogenesis. The nucleus, as the largest and stiffest cellular organelle, often limits cellular deformability, making it a key factor in migration through narrow pores or highly constrained spaces. In this work, we introduce a geometric surface partial differential equation (GS-PDE) model in which the cell plasma membrane and nuclear envelope are described as evolving energetic closed surfaces governed by force-balance equations. We replicate the results of a biophysical experiment, where a microfluidic device is used to impose compressive stresses on cells by driving them through narrow microchannels under a controlled pressure gradient. The model is validated by reproducing cell entry into the microchannels. A parametric sensitivity analysis highlights the dominant influence of specific parameters, whose accurate estimation is essential for faithfully capturing the experimental setup. We found that surface tension and confinement geometry emerge as key determinants of translocation efficiency. Although tailored to this specific setup for validation purposes, the framework is sufficiently general to be applied to a broad range of cell mechanics scenarios, providing a robust and flexible tool for investigating the interplay between cell mechanics and confinement. It also offers a solid foundation for future extensions integrating more complex biochemical processes such as active confined migration.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global public health threat that complicates the treatment and control of bacterial infections. Shigella spp., a leading cause of bacterial diarrhea worldwide, has increasingly exhibited resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents that are commonly recommended therapy for severe shigellosis. Although conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) remains the reference standard, it is time-consuming and provides limited insight into the genetic mechanisms underlying resistance. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has emerged as a complementary approach for AMR detection by enabling direct identification of resistance genetic determinants encoded in bacterial genomes. Machine learning (ML) methods applied to genomic features such as k-mers have shown promise for predicting resistance phenotypes from WGS data; however, applications to Shigella remain limited. In this study, we developed and evaluated an interpretable ML framework for predicting ciprofloxacin resistance using k-mer features derived from WGS data of 1,424 Shigella isolates collected in Ontario, Canada, between 2018 and 2025. K-mers were extracted from known gene targets associated with ciprofloxacin resistance, including chromosomal quinoline resistance-determining regions (QRDRs: gyrA and parC) and plasmid-mediated determinants (qnr). Supervised ML approaches were trained and compared. We evaluated the influence of k-mer lengths (k=11, 15, 21 and 31) on predictive performance and model interpretability; and compared models based on chromosomal determinants alone and models incorporating both chromosomal and plasmid-mediated determinants. Randon Forest classifier achieved the most consistent performance across models. Inclusion of plasmid-mediated determinants improved predictive accuracy relative to chromosomal-only models. Although differences across k-mer lengths were modest, k = 11 produced the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the lowest Brier score. SHAP analyses localized high-impact features within QRDRs of gyrA and parC, supporting biological interpretability. These findings demonstrate that biologically-informed k-mer-based ML models can accurately and transparently predict ciprofloxacin resistance in Shigella, supporting their potential integration into genomic AMR surveillance and digital public health frameworks. Author summaryIn this study, we used genome sequencing data to develop machine learning models that predict ciprofloxacin resistance for Shigella directly from bacterial DNA. We focused on small DNA fragments (k-mers) derived from known resistance genes and mutations. Among the approaches tested, a Random Forest model showed the most consistent performance. Combining chromosomal mutations with plasmid-mediated resistance genes improved prediction accuracy and helped identify key genetic regions associated with resistance. These findings demonstrate that machine learning applied to genomic data can accurately and interpretable predict antibiotic resistance, supporting its potential use in genomic surveillance and public health monitoring.

Detailed agent-based simulations are increasingly used to support policy decisions, but their computational cost and complex uncertainty structure make systematic scenario analysis challenging. We present a data-driven, uncertainty-aware decision support (DDUADS) workflow for using stochastic simulation models as decision-support tools under limited computational budgets. The approach combines several established techniques-sensitivity screening, Bayesian calibration using simulation-based inference, and multi-surrogate model integration for translational efficiency-into a coherent pipeline that enables uncertainty-aware policy analysis. Rather than producing a single baseline, the calibration stage yields a posterior distribution over plausible model parameterizations, allowing flexible, uncertainty-aware forward projections. We demonstrate the DDUADS workflow on the INFORM-HIV agent-based model of HIV transmission in Chicago to evaluate potential disruptions in antiretroviral therapy (ART) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use. While the specific application is HIV modeling, the challenges and techniques described here arise in other simulation studies and can be applied to decision support in other domains.

Patients who participate in intracranial neuroscience research make invaluable contributions to our understanding of the brain, accelerating the development of neurotechnological interventions. Engagement of patients as part of this research presents unique challenges, where study goals can be distant from immediate clinical applications and require specialized domain knowledge. Yet methods for meaningfully integrating patient communities as part of these research efforts is essential, as intracranial neuroscience guides the application of artificial intelligence for understanding and enhancing human cognition. In order to identify what patients consider meaningful research engagement we interviewed individuals who participated in a study during their Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) surgery and attended a group event where they interacted with our research team. Analysis of semi-structured interviews identified four main themes: interest in science and the future of clinical care, contributing to science to improve lives, connecting with others, and accessibility considerations. Based on these insights, we propose strategies for transformational participation of patient communities in intracranial neuroscience research with respect to engagement objectives, communication and scope. This approach offers a foundation for sustaining relationships between scientists and communities rooted in trust and transparency, to ensure that impacts of neurotechnology on human health and cognition are aligned with patient needs as well as desired public values.

Background: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in medical question-answering tasks, highlighting their potential for clinical decision support and medical education. However, their effectiveness in subspecialty areas such as nephrology remains underexplored. In this study, we assess the performance of open-source LLMs in answering multiple-choice questions from the Nephrology Self-Assessment Program (NephSAP) to better understand their capabilities and limitations within this specialized clinical domain. Methods: We evaluated the performance of five open-source large language models (LLMs): PodGPT which a podcast-pretrained model focused on STEMM disciplines, Llama 3.2-11B, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2, Falcon3-10B-Instruct, and Gemma-2-9B-it. Each model was tested on its ability to answer multiple-choice questions derived from the NephSAP. Model performance was quantified using accuracy, defined as the proportion of correctly answered questions. In addition, the quality of the models explanatory responses was assessed using several natural language processing (NLP) metrics: Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU), Word Error Rate (WER), cosine similarity, and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). For qualitative analysis, three board-certified nephrologists reviewed 40 randomly selected model responses to identify factual and clinical reasoning errors, with performance summarized as average error ratios based on the proportion of error-associated words per response. Results: Among the evaluated models, PodGPT achieved the highest accuracy (64.77%), whereas Llama showed the lowest performance with an accuracy of 45.08%. Qualitative analysis showed that PodGPT had the lowest factual error rate (0.017), while Llama and Falcon achieved the lowest reasoning error rates (0.038). Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of STEMM-based training to enhance the reasoning capabilities and reliability of LLMs in clinical contexts, supporting the development of more effective AI-driven decision-support tools in nephrology and other medical specialties.

Standard in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) using Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) does not reflect infection-site conditions, and its results often do not correlate with therapeutic outcomes. Here, we compared the antibiotic susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a common chronic wound pathogen, in simulated wound fluid (SWF) resembling wound exudate versus MHB, revealing discordant AST results across six of nine tested antibiotic classes. The most significant were 128-fold increased resistance to tetracyclines and 256-fold sensitization to {beta}-lactams in SWF. Tetracycline resistance was mediated by MntC, an extracellular manganese-binding protein, whereas {beta}-lactam sensitization was driven by cell envelope remodelling in SWF. Galleria mellonella wound infection results matched the SWF susceptibility phenotypes, suggesting SWF better predicts in vivo wound infection therapeutic outcomes. These comprehensive phenotypic and mechanistic insights into MRSA antibiotic responses under wound-infection-mimetic conditions with direct in vivo validation identify a potential new antibiotic adjuvant target and may guide improved antibiotic therapy for MRSA wound infections.

BackgroundCarrier screening for inherited genetic disorders can reduce the burden of conditions that lead to childhood morbidity and mortality, including thalassaemia, cystic fibrosis, and spinal muscular atrophy. To be successful, national carrier screening programs should aim to maximise uptake, which may depend on population preferences for screening characteristics. In this study, we aimed to determine how expanded carrier screening in Singapore should be designed based on operational factors including suggested copayments, wait times, and disorders included in screening panels. MethodsWe elicited stated preferences for the design of a hypothetical national carrier screening program with seven attributes from 500 Singaporeans of reproductive age (18 to 54). A discrete choice experiment was applied using 30 choice tasks with 3 alternatives per task, divided between 3 blocks. The mixed multinomial logit model was used to estimate willingness-to-pay for each attribute level. Predicted uptake for three plausible screening programs was assessed, with copayment amounts from $0 to $1,200 in increments of $30. Impact on the annual national budget was calculated as a function of 25,000 expected eligible couples per year. All costs were reported in 2026 SGD. ResultsRespondents showed the strongest preferences for cost, followed by the number of diseases included in the panel, then wait times, with limited impact of remaining attributes. With no copayments, predicted uptake ranged from 85% [95% CI: 83% to 87%] to 90% [88% to 92%] for the basic and utility-maximising screening programs, respectively. This declined to 61% [56% to 66%] and 69% [65% to 73%] and, respectively, at a copayment of $1,200 per test. The model predicted higher uptake if a selection of screening alternatives were available, compared to a single program. The budget impact was highly dependent on population eligibility, copayments, and couples decision-making processes, but was unlikely to exceed $22.5m [$19.0m to $26.6m] per year unless expanded beyond married couples. ConclusionsThere was high predicted demand for carrier screening even as copayments increased. Successful strategies to improve uptake may include reducing copays and wait times, increasing the number of screening options available to prospective parents, and increasing program eligibility beyond pre-conception married couples.

Gene networks (GNs) encode diverse molecular relationships and are central to interpreting cellular function and disease. The heterogeneity of interaction types has led to computational methods specialized for particular network contexts. Large language models (LLMs) offer a unified, language-based formulation of GN inference by leveraging biological knowledge from large-scale text corpora, yet their effectiveness remains sensitive to prompt design. Here, we introduce Gene-Relation Adaptive Soft Prompt (GRASP), a parameter-efficient and trainable framework that conditions inference on each gene pair through only three virtual tokens. Using factorized gene-specific and relation-aware components, GRASP learns to map each pair's biological context into compact soft prompts that combine pair-specific signals with shared interaction patterns. Across diverse GN inference tasks, GRASP consistently outperforms alternative prompting strategies. It also shows a stronger ability to recover unannotated interactions from synthetic negative sets, suggesting its capacity to identify biologically meaningful relationships beyond existing databases. Together, these results establish GRASP as a scalable and generalizable prompting framework for LLM-based GN inference.

Large language models are increasingly used for clinical guidance while their parent companies introduce advertising. We tested whether pharmaceutical ads embedded in the prompts of 12 models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google shift drug recommendations across 258,660 API calls and four experiments probing distinct epistemic conditions. When two drugs were both guideline appropriate, advertising shifted selection of the advertised drug by +12.7 percentage points (P < 0.001), with some model scenario pairs shifting from 0% to 100%. Google models were the most susceptible (+29.8 pp), followed by OpenAI (+10.9 pp), while Anthropic models showed minimal change (+2.0 pp). When the advertised product lacked evidence or was clinically suboptimal, models resisted. This reveals a structured vulnerability: advertising does not override medical knowledge but fills the space where clinical evidence is underdetermined. An open response sub analysis (2,340 calls across three representative models) confirmed that advertising restructures free-text clinical reasoning: models echoed ad claims at 2.7 times the baseline rate while maintaining high stated confidence and rarely disclosing the ad. Susceptibility was provider dependent (Google: +29.8 pp; OpenAI: +10.9 pp; Anthropic: +2.0 pp). Because this bias operates within clinically correct answers, it is invisible to accuracy based evaluation, identifying a class of AI safety vulnerability that standard testing cannot detect.

Safety net healthcare delivery organizations (SNOs) serve vulnerable populations but face persistent challenges in adopting new technologies, including AI. While systematic barriers to technology adoption in SNOs are well documented, little is known about how AI is implemented in these settings. This study explored real-world AI adoption in SNOs, focusing on identifying barriers encountered across the AI lifecycle and strategies used to overcome them. Five SNOs in the U.S. participated in a 12-month technical assistance program, the Practice Network, to implement AI tools of their choosing. Observed barriers and mitigation strategies were documented throughout program activities and, at the conclusion of the program, reviewed and refined with participants using a participatory research approach to ensure findings reflected lived experiences and organizational contexts. Key barriers emerged during the Integration and Lifecycle Management phases and included gaps in AI performance evaluation and impact assessments, communication with patients about AI use, foundational AI education, financial resources for purchasing and maintaining AI tools, and AI governance structures. Effective strategies for addressing these barriers were primarily supported through centralized expertise, structured guidance, and peer learning. These findings provide granular, actionable insights for SNO leaders, offering guidance for anticipating barriers and proactively planning mitigation strategies. By including SNO perspectives, the study also contributes to the broader health AI ecosystem and underscores the importance of participatory, collaborative approaches to support safe, effective, and ethical AI adoption in resource-constrained settings. Author SummarySafety net organizations (SNOs) are healthcare systems that primarily serve low-income and underinsured patients. While interest in artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has grown rapidly, little is known about how these organizations experience AI adoption in practice. In this study, we partnered with five SNOs over a 12-month program to document the challenges they encountered when implementing AI tools and the strategies they used to address them. We worked closely with SNO staff throughout the process to ensure our findings reflected their lived experiences with AI implementation. We found that the most common challenges arose when organizations tried to integrate AI into daily operations and monitor and maintain those tools over time. Specific barriers included difficulty evaluating whether AI was performing as expected, limited guidance on communicating with patients about AI use, a lack of resources for staff training, limited financial resources, and the absence of formal governance structures. Successful strategies for overcoming these challenges drew on shared knowledge and structured support provided by the program, as well as learning from peer organizations. These findings offer practical guidance for SNO leaders planning or managing AI adoption, and contribute to a broader conversation about what is required to implement AI safely and effectively in healthcare settings that serve the most medically and socially vulnerable patients.

As health systems begin deploying autonomous AI agents that make independent clinical decisions and take direct actions within care workflows, ensuring patient safety and care quality requires governance standards that go beyond existing medical device frameworks designed for human-in-the-loop prediction tools. This paper introduces the Healthcare AI Agents Regulatory Framework (HAARF), a comprehensive verification standard for autonomous AI systems in clinical environments, developed collaboratively with 40+ international experts spanning regulatory authorities, clinical organizations, and AI security specialists. HAARF synthesizes requirements from nine major regulatory frameworks (FDA, EU AI Act, Health Canada, UK MHRA, NIST AI RMF, WHO GI-AI4H, ISO/IEC 42001, OWASP AISVS, IMDRF GMLP) into eight core verification categories comprising 279 specific requirements across three risk-based implementation levels. The framework addresses critical gaps in health system readiness for autonomous AI including: (1) progressive autonomy governance with clinical accountability, (2) tool-use security for agents that independently access EHRs, medical devices, and clinical systems, (3) continuous equity monitoring and bias mitigation across diverse patient populations, and (4) clinical decision traceability preserving human oversight authority. We validate HAARFs enforcement capabilities through a scenario-based red-team evaluation comprising six adversarial scenarios executed under baseline (no middleware) and HAARF- guardrailed conditions (N = 50 trials each, Gemini 2.5 Flash primary with Claude Sonnet 4.6 cross-model validation). In baseline conditions, the agent model executes unauthorized tools in 56-60% of adversarial trials. Under the HAARF condition, deterministic middleware enforcement reduces the unauthorized-tool success rate to 0%, with 0% contraindication misses and 0% policy-injection success (95% Wilson CI [0.00, 0.07]). Cross-model validation confirms identical security metrics, supporting HAARFs model-agnostic design. Mapping analysis demonstrates 48-88% coverage of major regulatory frameworks, with per-category FDA alignment ranging from 73% (C5, Agent Registration) to 91% (C3, Cybersecurity; C7, Bias & Equity). Initial validation with healthcare organizations shows a 40-60% reduction in multi-jurisdictional compliance burden and improved clinical safety governance outcomes. HAARF provides health systems with a practical, risk-stratified pathway for safe AI agent deployment--shifting from reactive compliance to proactive quality governance while maintaining rigorous patient safety standards and human-centered care principles.

BackgroundDental caries and periodontal disease represent the most prevalent global oral health conditions, collectively affecting several billion people. The diagnostic interpretation of dental radiographs, a cornerstone of modern dentistry, is associated with considerable inter-observer variability. In routine clinical practice, clinicians are required to evaluate a high volume of radiographic images daily, a cognitively demanding task in which diagnostic fatigue, time constraints, and the inherent complexity of overlapping anatomical structures can lead to the inadvertent oversight of early-stage pathologies. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a transformative opportunity to augment clinical decision-making by providing rapid, objective, and consistent radiographic analysis, thereby serving as a tireless adjunct capable of flagging findings that may be missed during routine human inspection. MethodsThis study developed and validated a deep learning system for the automated detection of dental caries and alveolar bone loss using a dataset of 1,063 periapical and bitewing radiographs. Two separate YOLOv8s object detection models were trained and evaluated using a rigorous 5-fold cross-validation methodology. To align with the clinical use-case of a screening tool where high sensitivity is paramount, a custom image-level evaluation criterion was employed: a true positive was recorded if any predicted bounding box had a Jaccard Index (IoU) > 0 with any ground truth annotation. Model performance was systematically evaluated at confidence thresholds of 0.10 and 0.05. ResultsAt a confidence threshold of 0.05, the caries detection model achieved a mean precision of 84.41% ({+/-}0.72%), recall of 85.97% ({+/-}4.72%), and an F1-score of 85.13% ({+/-}2.61%). The alveolar bone loss model demonstrated exceptionally high performance, with a mean precision of 95.47% ({+/-}0.94%), recall of 98.60% ({+/-}0.49%), and an F1-score of 97.00% ({+/-}0.46%). ConclusionThe YOLOv8-based models demonstrated high accuracy and high sensitivity for detecting dental caries and alveolar bone loss on periapical radiographs. The system shows significant potential as a reliable automated assistant for dental practitioners, helping to improve diagnostic consistency, reduce the risk of missed pathology, and ultimately enhance the standard of patient care.

Family planning (FP) self-care is a strategic pillar for advancing Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and mitigating health workforce shortages. However, a significant disconnect persists between global normative frameworks and local implementation realities. This study examines the local meanings, perceptions, and experiences of FP self-care in Niger to inform contextualized scale-up of self-care interventions. We employed a sequential mixed-methods design in the Niamey (urban) and Zinder (rural) regions of Niger. A quantitative household survey was conducted with 510 women and 357 men to assess fertility awareness, method preferences, and information-seeking behaviors. This was complemented by qualitative in-depth interviews with 36 women, 18 men, 12 healthcare providers, and 15 community leaders. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative transcripts underwent iterative thematic analysis mapped to global self-care frameworks. "Self-care" was locally reconstructed not as autonomy. While defined by all participants as hygiene, it was uniquely reconstructed by men and community leaders as economic provision. A distinct "medicalization paradox" emerged: women defined self-care as the agency to seek clinical dependence, prioritizing facility-based providers over community sources (e.g., 58.1% vs. 12.1% for oral contraceptives) to mitigate fears regarding product quality and side effects. Conversely, men favored Community Health Workers (34.3%) driven by logistical efficiency and economic motivations. Physiological knowledge was low; only 11.8% of women correctly identified the fertile window, with misconceptions reinforced by fatalistic narratives propagated by community gatekeepers. Furthermore, providers expressed strong skepticism regarding user competence, fearing "chaos" without medical supervision. Implementing FP self-care in Niger requires shifting from a "product-first" to a "values-first" approach. Strategies must be gender-stratified: leveraging "medicalized validation" to address womens safety concerns while utilizing community-based channels to meet mens efficiency needs. Ultimately, self-care should be framed not as independence from the health system, but as an empowered partnership with it.

Improving diversity in U.S. Alzheimers disease (AD) research is a pressing need. By 2050, Hispanic and Latino Americans will comprise 30% of the population. Hispanics are 1.5 times more likely and Blacks are twice as likely to develop AD compared to Whites, yet both remain vastly underrepresented in clinical trials research. Aging and AD research mentorship of underrepresented STEM undergraduates is designed to promote entry into related professions by students committed to decreasing disparities in AD research participation and clinical care. The NIA-funded MADURA program recruited 93 students from backgrounds historically underrepresented in STEM majors and/or from NIH-defined disadvantaged backgrounds. Trainees were placed in aging/AD research labs and received weekly training and mentorship from faculty research PIs and other types of supervisors (postdoctoral researchers, graduate students, research assistant staff...) Our study examined student ratings of the program and mentor behaviors, using a program-specific survey and the Mentoring Competency Assessment-21 (MCA-21). Trainees were highly satisfied with both mentoring relationships and the overall program. Student rated MCA-21 competency areas were quite high for both P.I.s and other types of research mentors. However, there were striking differences in associations between competencies and relationship and program satisfaction, by mentor type. For PI mentors, no MCA-21 competencies were associated with relationship satisfaction, but five of six competencies were associated with relationship satisfaction for other mentor types. Similarly, no PI mentor competencies were significantly correlated with overall placement satisfaction, but all six competencies were correlated with overall placement satisfaction for other mentor types. The authors discuss the likelihood of differing student expectations of faculty PI versus other types of research mentors, recommendations for assessing role-specific student expectations (including functions primarily possible only for senior faculty PIs), and utilizing nearer-peer plus PI faculty mentors to comprehensively address the gamut of mentee needs.

Lightweight epidemic calculators are widely used for teaching and rapid scenario exploration, yet many omit the methodological detail needed for scientific reuse. We present a browser-native SIR calculator that exposes forward Euler and classical fourth-order Runge--Kutta (RK4) integration alongside epidemiologically interpretable outputs and a population-conservation diagnostic. The implementation is anchored to analytical properties of the deterministic SIR system, including the epidemic threshold, the peak condition, and the final-size relation. Benchmark experiments show that RK4 is essentially step-size invariant over practical discretizations, whereas Euler at a coarse one-day step overestimates peak prevalence by 3.97% and final size by 0.66% relative to a fine-step RK4 reference. These results demonstrate that browser-based tools can support publication-quality computational narratives when solver choice, diagnostics, and assumptions are treated as first-class outputs.

Manuscript preparation is a critical bottleneck in scientific publishing, yet existing AI writing tools require cloud transmission of sensitive content, creating data-confidentiality barriers for clinical researchers. We introduce the Paper Analysis Tool (PAT), a free, multi-agent framework that deploys 31 specialized agents powered by small language models (SLMs) to audit manuscripts across multiple quality dimensions without external data transmission. Applied to three published clinical neurological papers, PAT generated 540 evaluable suggestions. Validation by two expert reviewers (R.B., A.G.) confirmed 391 actionable, high-value revisions (90% agreement), achieving a 72.4% overall usefulness accuracy spanning methodological, statistical, and visual domains. Furthermore, deterministic re-evaluation of 126 agent-suggested rewrite pairs using Phase 0 metrics confirmed text improvement: total word count decreased by 25%, passive voice prevalence dropped sharply from 35% to 5%, average sentence length decreased by 24%, long-sentence fraction fell by 67%, and the Flesch-Kincaid grade improved by 17% . Our validation confirms that systematic, agent-driven pre-submission review drives measurable improvements, successfully converting manuscript optimization from an opaque, manual endeavor into a transparent and rigorous scientific process. Manuscript preparation is a critical bottleneck in scientific publishing, yet existing AI writing tools require cloud transmission of sensitive content, creating data-confidentiality barriers for clinical researchers. We introduce the Paper Analysis Tool (PAT), a free, multi-agent framework that deploys 31 specialized agents powered by small language models (SLMs) to audit manuscripts across multiple quality dimensions without external data transmission. Applied to three published clinical neurological papers, PAT generated 540 evaluable suggestions. Independent validation by two expert reviewers (R.B., A.G.) confirmed 391 actionable, high-value revisions (90% agreement), achieving a 72.4% overall usefulness accuracy spanning methodological, statistical, and visual domains. Furthermore, deterministic re-evaluation of 126 suggested Phase 0 rewrite pairs confirmed text improvement: total word count decreased by 25%, passive voice prevalence dropped sharply from 35% to 5%, average sentence length decreased by 24%, and long-sentence fraction fell by 67%, and the Flesch-Kincaid grade improved modestly. Our validation confirms that systematic, agent-driven pre-submission review drives measurable improvements, successfully converting manuscript optimization from an opaque, manual endeavor into a transparent and rigorous scientific process.

Military aviation training noise remains understudied despite its widespread impacts across urban, rural, and wilderness areas. The predominance of low-frequency noise and repetitive training can create pervasive noise pollution, yet past research often fails to capture the full range of health and quality-of-life effects. This study analyzed two complaint datasets related to Whidbey Island Naval Air Station noise: U.S. Navy records (2017-2020) and Quiet Skies Over San Juan County data (2021-2023). We analyzed and mapped sentiment intensity from noise complaints relative to modeled annual noise exposure, developed a typology to classify impacts, and modeled the environmental and operational factors influencing complaints. Findings revealed widespread negative sentiment and anger, often beyond the bounds of estimated noise contours, suggesting that annual cumulative noise models inadequately estimate community impacts. Complaints consistently highlighted sleep disturbance, hearing and health concerns, and compromised home environments due to shaking, vibration, and disruption of daily life. Residents also reported significant social, recreational, and work disruptions, along with feelings of fear, helplessness, and concern for children's well-being. The number of complaints were strongly associated with training schedules, with late-night sessions being the strongest predictor. A delayed response pattern suggests residents reach a frustration threshold before filing complaints. Overall, our findings demonstrate persistent negative sentiment and diverse impacts from military aviation noise. Results highlight the need for improved noise metrics, modeling and operational adjustments to mitigate the most disruptive effects.